Now That We Know, What Do We Do?

There's this school that I heard of. One September they ran some tests to find out where the students sit in their Mathematical skills and abilities and their reading comprehension abilities. This school was able to pull results for entire grade levels and for individual classrooms.

This hypothetical school had some revealing and important results.

I will leave the chart untitled to protect the identity of the school and the classroom, but suffice it to say that the majority of the diagnostic results for both Math and L.A. across the grades and classrooms revealed similar results.

This particular school had a majority of students within each classroom that were reading below grade level and performing mathematical skills well below grade level.

This school and it's teacher were thus left with a dilemma Now that they know the results what do they do with the students?

The answer was not as complicated as it first appeared.

The answer lay in the minds and will of the individual teachers. The answer was indeed completely liberating. The teachers in this school rejoiced at the freedom they were given to operate and experiment at this school.

The answer, for the teachers was that they could Do whatever they wanted!!!

As most people could tell from the results this was not a typical classroom, not at all.
What a school to work in? It was practically risk free and it quickly became a breeding ground for the best and most innovative educational ideas. Consider the following argument, that led to the innovation:

1. The teachers assumed that most of these students had been taught in classrooms that were segmented into age directed grade based levels, broken up into pieces of disciplinary segments (math, social, science, L.A.) where students sat in rows or groups of students and attempted to learn what a teacher gave them to learn. 
2. The teachers also assumed that the students in this classroom had a variety of learning barriers, gaps in their learning, a deficit in the family support system and less than perfect attendance (read: a horrible attendance problem that proved to be a major barrier).
3. The teachers then concluded that if they were to continue to teach the students in the same method detailed in assumption #1 and there was no meaningful progress in alleviating the barriers outlined in assumption #2 that they could reasonably expect that there would be no real change in student results: a majority of students would continue to perform underneath "grade level" expectations.

Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.

My Message that I take away from the school in the above story: We can do anything we want with these results.

We can innovate. We can teach individual students. We can allow our highest achievers the freedom to grow at an accelerated pace. We can slow things down and start motivating students to want to learn. We can throw out the curriculum and focus on literacy. We can meet the students where they are and raise them up. We can spend half a day bonding with students because we know that when they feel safe, then they feel safe enough to learn. We can turn the bells off or we can keep them on. We can give students play time. We can show kids why we learn math, and why it is important. We can ignore the judicial branch of government unless a kid cares about the judicial branch of government. We can stop making thirty different kids read the same damn book, unless, of course they want to learn in a community book club. We can let the kids that hate volleyball play around and wrestle instead. We can give ourselves the freedom to care a little less about structure and a little more about learning. We can stop worrying about things we can't control, like families and previous learning experiences, and chronically poor attendance, and we can start caring more about the things we can control, like helping kids see the joy in learning and helping students see the importance of growing through academic pursuits.

By avoiding the status quo it would, at least, be possible to succeed. Honestly, turning the whole school upside down seems a lot less insane then keeping things the same way.

Are you with me?